|
1. Office of The Ombudsman facebook fan page and
online games
The
Office of The Ombudsman has launched a facebook fan page and
two online games to enhance public understanding on our
functions and jurisdiction.
To “like”
our facebook fan page, please click the below link:

Game 1:
The Smart Complainant (申訴達人)

Game 2:
Ombudsman Ambassador (申訴大使)

Office
of The Ombudsman
27 April 2012
2. Press Release
The Office of The Ombudsman
held a press conference on Thursday, 23 February 2012 at
10:00 am to announce the OmbudsNews Issue No. 3
of the Reporting Year 2011/12, which includes the result of
one direct investigation and two anonymised investigation
reports.
For details, please visit the
"OmbudsNews" page in
this site.
Office of The Ombudsman
23 February 2012
3. Press Release - Ombudsman Probes Regulatory
Measures and Enforcement Actions against Unauthorised
Extension of Business Area of Restaurants
The Ombudsman, Mr Alan Lai,
declares today (9 February 2012) a direct investigation into
the Administration's regulatory measures and enforcement
actions against unauthorised extension of business area of
restaurants.
Some restaurant
operators often extend their business area to pedestrian
passageways or occupy parts of the passageways for storage
or display, causing street obstruction and environmental
hygiene and noise problems.
At present, the
Food and Environmental Hygiene Department ("FEHD") regulates
food businesses through a licensing system and takes
enforcement actions against street obstruction under the
Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance and its
by-laws or the Summary Offences Ordinance. Food business
licensees who are charged and convicted for engaging in
unauthorised food operations outside their licensed premises
are liable to pecuniary penalty. FEHD also record demerit
points against them under the Demerit Points System.
Accumulation of a certain number of demerit points may
result in suspension or cancellation of licences.
Mr Lai said, "We
note from the complaint cases we handled and our general
observations that FEHD's regulation of street obstruction by
restaurants and its enforcement actions have not been
effective. The problem persists and is unresolved. In this
direct investigation, we will try to identify the
inadequacies and make recommendations to the Administration
for improvement."
The Ombudsman
welcomes public views and information relevant to this
investigation. Please send them to the Office of The
Ombudsman before 10 March 2012:
Address : 30/F, China
Merchants Tower, Shun Tak Centre
168-200 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong
Fax : 2882 8149
Email :
complaints@omb.gov.hk
Office of The Ombudsman
9 February 2012
For press enquiries: 2629 0565
4. Press Release - Positive complaint handling recognised by The Ombudsman's Awards
The Office of The Ombudsman hosted the 15th Ombudsman's
Awards Presentation Ceremony today (17 November 2011). The
Housing Department won the Grand Award while the Education
Bureau and the Labour Department were runners-up. The
Ombudsman, Mr Alan Lai, presented the Awards to winning
organisations and 32 public officers. Over 200
representatives from Government departments and public
organisations took part in the ceremony to share the joy and
experience.
"For the past
two decades, this Office has dedicated itself to promoting a
positive complaint culture and improving the quality of
public administration in society. To achieve this mission,
we believe that giving recognition to the efforts of the
public sector is important. That's why we introduced The
Ombudsman's Awards in 1997. I am truly grateful for the
continuous support from Government departments and public
organisations to this annual presentation ceremony," said Mr
Lai at the ceremony.
Mr Lai
highlights that the Awards is not set up to commend public
bodies who make no mistakes or get no complaints, but to
encourage a positive approach in handling complaint and a
readiness to learn and improve from mistakes.
The winner of
this year's Grand Award is the Housing Department. Being in
close touch with the public and dealing with an enormous
clientele, the Department has been a major organisation
under complaint. Nonetheless, The Ombudsman considers that
the Housing Department assumes a positive attitude towards
complaints and makes the best use of them to enrich staff's
knowledge and skills. They are forthcoming, cooperative and
comprehensive in responding to inquiries from The
Ombudsman. They also take the initiative to resolve
complaints expeditiously through constructive dialogue with
complainants. Where deficiencies are identified, Housing
Department initiates improvement measures and always
welcomes the views from The Ombudsman.
The other two
award winners are the Education Bureau and the Labour
Department. The Ombudsman is impressed by their
professionalism in complaint handling. Their replies to The
Ombudsman's inquiries have always been thorough and
comprehensive. The Ombudsman's inquiries often reveal that
both organisations have fully dealt with the subject matters
under complaint with utmost efficiency and effectiveness.
In response to recommendations for improvement, they adopt a
positive attitude and are often prepared to remedy
inadequacies.
The Ombudsman's
Awards Scheme was launched in 1997. Since 1999, the Scheme
has been extended to honour individual public officers for
their significant contribution in improving public service,
particularly through handling complaints and redressing
grievances. In 2011, the scope of the Awards is extended to
recognise public officer's efforts in handing enquiries and
complaints relating to the Code on Access to Information.
This year, there are a total of 32 individual award
recipients.
A full list of
the awardees this year is in the
Appendix.
For press enquiries, please
contact:
Ms Kathleen CHAN, Senior
Manager (External Relations) (Tel: 2629 0565)
Appendix
List of the
Awardees
Office of The Ombudsman
17 November 2011
5. PRESS RELEASE
The Office of
The Ombudsman held a press conference at 10:00 a.m. on
Thursday, 15 September 2011 to announce the OmbudsNews
Issue No. 2 of the Reporting Year 2011/12, which includes
the result of two direct investigations reports.
For details, please visit the
"OmbudsNews" page in
this site.
Office of The Ombudsman
15 September 2011
6. PRESS RELEASE - Ombudsman Probes Effectiveness of
Administration of Temporary Closure of Metered Car Parking
Spaces during Road Works Carried Out by Public Utilities
The Ombudsman, Mr Alan Lai, is initiating a direct
investigation into the effectiveness of Government's
administration of temporary closure of metered car parking
spaces during road excavation works carried out by public
utilities, pursuant to section 7(1) (a) (ii) of The
Ombudsman Ordinance, Cap. 397.
Through complaint handling, the Office of The Ombudsman
noted that some metered car parking spaces have been
unnecessarily closed for periods much longer than the actual
time required for carrying out road excavation works by
public utilities. "In view of the limited number of metered
car parking spaces and the high demand for such facilities,
we consider that the closure of such car parking spaces
should be kept to the minimum," Mr Lai said.
Besides, under the Excavation Permit Management system,
public utilities which need to carry out road works have to
apply to the Highways Department ("HyD") for excavation
permits and, where applicable, also to other relevant
authorities/departments for the necessary assessments and
approvals, such as approvals from the Transport Department
("TD") and the Police for temporary traffic management
proposals. If temporary closure of metered car parking
spaces is required due to road works, the public utility
concerned has to apply direct to TD for approval under the
Road Traffic (Parking) Regulations, Cap 374C. Upon
completion of the above processes, HyD will issue an
excavation permit to the public utility concerned with
appropriate conditions.
In exercising control on excavation works in streets, HyD
undertakes audit inspections on active excavation permit
sites and, on identifying any non-compliance with the permit
conditions such as improper temporary pedestrian
arrangement, notifies the excavation permit holders
concerned for swift rectification. However, it does not
check on any mismatch between utilities' works progress and
the temporary parking spaces closure period, as this falls
beyond the jurisdiction of its excavation permit control
mechanism. TD all along did not monitor actual occupation of
the suspended metered car parking spaces by public utilities
for scheduled excavation works and only requested them
verbally or through e-mail to report changes of commencement
or completion of the works. The situation appears very
unsatisfactory, as it may result in wasted public resources
and unjustified inconvenience to drivers.
Upon our inquiry, TD and HyD have recently initiated some
enhancement measures, including:
- conducting audit
inspections by HyD to identify and notify TD of any
anomalies such as unreported delayed
commencement/early completion of excavation works
resulting in unnecessary closure of the metered car
parking spaces; and
- imposing new
"approval conditions" by TD and a new excavation
permit condition by HyD.
However, there are still many
cases of non-compliance. In view of this, we consider it
necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of these enhancement
measures, hence this investigation, which will examine:
| (a)
|
deficiencies in
administering temporary closure of metered car
parking spaces during road excavation works carried
out by public utilities; |
| (b)
|
effectiveness of
the enhanced measures by TD and HyD in the
monitoring of temporary closure of metered car
parking spaces during road excavation works carried
out by public utilities; and |
| (c)
|
other measures, if
any, for further improvement. |
The Ombudsman welcomes public views on this matter. Comments
should reach the Office of The Ombudsman by 18 August
2011:
|
Address :
|
30/F, China
Merchants Tower, Shun Tak Centre 168-200 Connaught
Road Central, Hong Kong |
|
Fax : |
2882 8149 |
|
E-mail : |
complaints@ombudsman.hk |
For press enquiries, please
contact:
Ms Kathleen Chan, Senior Manager (External Relations)
(Tel: 2629 0565)
Office of The Ombudsman
21 July 2011
7. PRESS RELEASE - Ombudsman Probes Booking and Use
of Sports Facilities Managed by Leisure and Cultural
Services Department
The Ombudsman, Mr Alan Lai, is initiating a direct
investigation into the booking and utilisation of sports
facilities managed by the Leisure and Cultural Services
Department ("LCSD") in order to ensure the proper use of
facilities heavily subsidised by public funds.
The Office
of The Ombudsman often receives complaints or enquiries
about LCSD sports facilities, mostly involving the booking
and use of venues. Over the past two years, for instance,
the Office has handled more than 50 such complaint cases.
Currently,
for LCSD's land-based facilities, there are totally around
62,000 fee-charging (mostly on one-hour basis) and 12,000
non-fee charging sessions available each day for use by the
public. These facilities are provided for a wide variety of
sports activities.
"About 80%
of the general costs of LCSD sports facilities, programmes
and related activities are subsidised by public funds.
Users come from different age groups and all walks of life
in the territory. It is, therefore, of utmost importance to
ensure that members of the public have a fair chance to use
those facilities and that abuse and wastages are stopped as
far as possible," Mr Lai said today (5 July 2011).
"The
complaints we received and media reports in recent years
also showed that touting of reserved sessions in sports
facilities has aroused much public concern. Online touting
is particularly rampant. The Administration’s measures to
crack down on such unauthorised activities appear to be less
than effective," Mr Lai continued.
To foster
sports development in Hong Kong, LCSD's current policy
allows block-booking of sports venues by certain
organisations (such as national sports associations,
district or community sports clubs, schools, Government
departments, charitable organisations, bona fide
associations and corporations, etc) for sports competitions,
events and training courses. Priority booking can be made
three to 12 months in advance, depending on the nature of
the applicant organisation and the event to be held.
Individuals can only make advance booking of sessions not
taken up by block-booking within 30 days.
To balance
the rights and needs between organisations and individuals
regarding the use of sports venues, the Administration has
set restrictions on block-booking and put in place a penalty
system to prevent abuse of priority booking by organisations.
At present, block-booking is subject to quota control which
mainly covers: (1) during peak hours (for urban venues, it
means the whole day of Saturdays, Sundays and public
holidays, as well as 5 pm to 11 pm on weekdays), not more
than one-third of the total available hours of the month;
and (2) not more than half of the total number of facilities
at each venue at any one time.
Our
preliminary inquiries have identified room for improvement
in the LCSD booking and allocation mechanism of sports
facilities. Take the fee-charging and non-fee charging
land-based sports facilities as an illustration. In the
year 2009/10, LCSD recorded more than 700 cases of breach of
the conditions of use by priority user organisations which,
having confirmed the booking of a venue, subsequently did
not turn up and failed to cancel the booking at least 40
days prior to the date of use as required. Each time,
however, LCSD just issued a verbal or written
advice/warning, even to repeated offenders. Without any
substantial penalty, the deterrent effect is questionable.
'If the
Administration is to successfully promote 'Sports for All',
it is essential that there should be a better mechanism for
booking and using sports facilities by the general public.
We hope the direct investigation can help achieve this
objective," Mr Lai added.
The direct investigation will examine:
(a) the booking and allocation mechanism of LCSD sports
facilities;
(b) measures to prevent abuse and wastage of reserved
facilities;
(c) measures against touting or unauthorised transfer of
reserved
sessions; and
(d) any areas for improvement.
The Ombudsman
welcomes public views on this matter. Comments and views
should reach the Office of The Ombudsman by 6 August 2011:
Address
: 30/F, China Merchants Tower, Shun Tak Centre
168-200 Connaught Road
Central, Hong Kong
Fax : 2882 8149
Email
:
complaints@ombudsman.hk
For press enquiries, please
contact:
Ms Kathleen Chan, Senior
Manager (External Relations) (Tel: 2629 0565)
Office of The Ombudsman
5 July 2011
8. PRESS RELEASE
The Office of The Ombudsman held a press conference on Tuesday,
19 April 2011
at 10:00 a.m. to announce the OmbudsNews Issue
No. 1 of the Reporting Year 2011/12, which includes the
result of one direct investigation and two anonymised
investigation reports.
For details, please visit the
"OmbudsNews" page in
this site.
Office of The Ombudsman
19 April 2011
|